Autores
- Matthew DysonUniversidade de Oxford, European Society for Comparative Legal History.
Resumo
Qualquer que seja a direção da pesquisa sobre história do direito em perspectiva comparada, ela pode ser facilitada por um punhado de etapas metodológicas extraídas tanto do direito comparado quanto da história do direito. Este artigo discute as fronteiras, a terminologia e a finalidade da metodologia e um conjunto de cinco etapas metodológicas que podem auxiliar na prática da história do direito em perspectiva comparada, utilizando exemplos de diversos sistemas jurídicos dos últimos 200 anos.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Biografia do Autor
Matthew Dyson, Universidade de Oxford, European Society for Comparative Legal History.
Professor de Direito Civil e Criminal no Corpus Christi College, Universidade de Oxford. Membro associado do 6KBW College Hill, Chambers; Research Fellow no Utrecht Centre for Accountability and Liability Law; e Presidente da European Society for Comparative Legal History.
Referências
ANDENAS, Mads; FAIRGRIEVE, Duncan. “There is a World Out Elsewhere” - Lord Bingham and Comparative Law. In: ANDENAS, Mads; FAIRGRIEVE, Duncan (Orgs.). Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 856–862.
ANDERSEN, Camilla; TWINING, William; HALPIN, Andrew; et al. A Fresh Start for Comparative Legal Studies? A Collective Review of Patrick Glenn’s Legal Traditions of the World, 2nd edition. Journal of Comparative Law, v. 1, p. 100–199, 2006.
ANDREWS, J. A. The Criminal in the Civil Courts. Criminal Law Review, p. 441 et seq., 1967.
BANAKAS, Efstathios. The Contribution of Comparative Law to the Harmonization of European Private Law. In: HARDING, Andrew; ÖRÜCÜ, Esin (Orgs.). Comparative law in the 21st century. London: Kluwer, 2002.
BELL, John. French Legal Cultures. London: Butterworths, 2001.
BELL, John. Path Dependence and Legal Development. Tulane Law Review, v. 87, n. 4, p. 787 et seq., 2013.
BELL, John; IBBETSON, David. European Legal Development: The Case of Tort. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
BODGAN, Michael. Comparative Law. Gothenburg: Kluwer, 1994.
CAMPBELL, J. Civil Evidence—The Act of 1968. The Cambridge Law Journal, v. 27, n. 1, p. 35–37, 1969.
COOTE, Brian. Damages, The Liesbosch, and Impecuniosity. The Cambridge Law Journal, v. 60, n. 3, p. 511–536, 2001.
COTTERRELL, Roger. Comparatists and Sociology. In: LEGRAND, Pierre; MUNDAY, Roderick J. C. (Orgs.). Comparative legal studies: traditions and transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003.
COWEN, Zelman. Police---loss of services caused by tortfeasor---action per quod servitium amisit does not lie for the crown. Law Quarterly Review, v. 69, p. 180 et seq., 1953.
COWEN, Zelman; CARTER, P. B. The Admissibility of Criminal Convictions in Subsequent Civil Proceedings. In: COWEN, Zelman; CARTER, P. B. (Eds.). Essays on the Law of Evidence. Oxford: Clarendon, 1956.
Crimes and Misdemeanours, v. 3, n. 2, nov. 2009.
DAVID, René; BRIERLEY, John E. C. Major Legal Systems in the World Today: an Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law. 2. ed. London: Stevens and Sons, 1978.
DAVID, René; JAUFFRET-SPINOSI, Camille. Les grands systèmes de droit contemporains. 11. ed. Paris: Dalloz, 2002.
DÍAZ ALABART, Silvia. La responsabilidad por los actos ilícitos dañosos de los sometidos a patria potesta do tutela. Anuario de derecho civil, v. 40, n. 3, p. 795–894, 1987.
DYSON, Matthew (Org.). Comparing Tort and Crime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
DYSON, Matthew. Connecting Tort and Crime: Comparative Legal History in England and Spain since 1850. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, v. 11, p. 247–288, 2009.
DYSON, Matthew. Divide and Conquer: using legal domains in Comparative Legal Studies. In: HELLERINGER, Geneviève; PURNHAGEN, Kai (Orgs.). Towards a European legal culture. München: Beck, 2014.
DYSON, Matthew. If the Present were the Past. American Journal of Legal History, v. 56, n. 1, p. 41–52, 2016.
DYSON, Matthew. Symposium on Legal Domains and Comparative Law. Wheels Within Wheels: Using Legal Domains for Domestic Comparative Law. Edinburgh Law Review, v. 17, n. 3, p. 420–430, 2013.
ERNST, Wolfgang (Org.). The Development of Traffic Liablity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
EWALD, William. Comparative Jurisprudence (I): What Was it Like to Try a Rat. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, v. 143, n. 6, p. 1889–2149, 1995.
EWALD, William. Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 43, n. 4, p. 489–510, 1995.
EWALD, William. Legal History and Comparative Law. Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht, v. 7, n. 3, p. 553–559, 1999.
GLENN, H. Patrick. Legal traditions of the world: sustainable diversity in law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
GOMEZ DE LA SERNA, Pedro; MONTALBAN, Juan Manuel. Elementos del Derecho Penal de España. Madrid: Sanchez, 1849.
GOODERSON, R. N. Evidence. Admissibility of Criminal Convictions in Civil Proceedings Generally and in Defamation Actions. The Cambridge Law Journal, v. 25, n. 1, p. 36–39, 1967.
GORDLEY, James. Comparative Law and Legal History. In: REIMANN, Mathias; ZIMMERMANN, Reinhard (Orgs.). Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
GORDLEY, James Gordley, Myths of the French Civil Code. American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 42, p. 459-505, 1994.
GORDLEY, James. Comparative Legal Research: Its Function in the Development of Harmonized Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 43, n. 4, p. 555–567, 1995.
GRAZIADEI, Michele. Comparative law, legal history and the holistic approach to legal cultures. Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht, v. 7, n. 3, p. 531 et seq., 1999.
GRAZIADEI, Michele. The Functionalist Heritage. In: VAN HOECKE, Mark (Org.). Epistemology and methodology of comparative law. Oxford: Hart, 2004.
GROSSFELD, Bernard. The Strength and Weakness of Comparative Law. Trad. Tony Weir. Oxford: Hart, 1990.
HANDLEY, K. R. (Org.). Spencer Bower, Turner and Handley the doctrine of res judicata. 3. ed. London: Butterworths, 1996.
HARTLEY, Leslie Poles. The Go-Between. Londres: Hamish Hamilton, 1953.
HARTY, Siobhán. Lawyers, Codification, and the Origins of Catalan Nationalism, 1881-1901. Law and History Review, v. 20, n. 2, p. 349–384, 2002.
HAZELTINE, H. D. The Study of Comparative Legal History. Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law, p. 27 et seq., 1927.
HILL, Jonathan. Comparative Law, Law Reform and Legal Theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, v. 9, n. 1, p. 101–115, 1989.
JACOBSON, Stephen. Law and Nationalism in Nineteenth-Century Europe: The Case of Catalonia in Comparative Perspective. Law and History Review, v. 20, n. 2, p. 307–347, 2002.
JANSEN, Nils. Comparative Law within the Field of Comparative Disciplines. In: REIMANN, Mathias; ZIMMERMANN, Reinhard (Orgs.). Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
JOHNSON, E. L. Res Judicata: A Comparative Study. Current Legal Problems, v. 18, n. 1, p. 81–92, 1965.
JOHNSTON, David. Roman Law, Comparative Law and Legal History. Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht, v. 7, p. 560 et seq., 1999.
KAHN-FREUND, O. On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law. The Modern Law Review, v. 37, n. 1, p. 1–27, 1974.
KAHN-FREUND, Otto. Comparative Law as an Academic Subject. Law Quarterly Review, v. 82, 1966.
LADEUR, Karl-Heinz. Methodology and European Law – Can Methodology Change so as to Cope with the Multiplicity of the Law. In: VAN HOECKE, Mark (Org.). Epistemology and methodology of comparative law. Oxford: Hart, 2004.
LEGRAND, Pierre. Comparative Legal Studies and Commitment to Theory. The Modern Law Review, v. 58, n. 2, p. 262–273, 1995.
LEGRAND, Pierre. European Legal Systems are not Converging. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, v. 45, n. 1, p. 52–81, 1996.
LEGRAND, Pierre. How to compare now. Legal Studies, v. 16, n. 2, p. 232–242, 1996.
LEGRAND, Pierre. What “Legal Transplants”? In: NELKEN, David; FEEST, Johannes (Orgs.). Adapting Legal Cultures. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001.
LEWIS, Andrew. On Not Expecting the Spanish Inquisition: The Uses of Comparative Legal History. Current Legal Problems, v. 57, n. 1, p. 53–84, 2004.
MARKESINIS, Basil. Unity or Division: The Search for Similarities in Contemporary European Law. In: ANDENAS, Mads; BELL, John (Orgs.). Tort Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective. London: BIICL, 2002.
MARKESINIS, Basil S. Unité ou divergence : à la recherche des ressemblances dans le droit européen contemporain. Revue internationale de droit comparé, v. 53, n. 4, p. 807–830, 2001.
MARTÍN-CASALS, Miquel (Org.). The Development of Liability in Relation to Technological Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
MATTEI, Ugo. The Comparative Jurisprudence of Schlesinger and Sacco: A Study in Legal Influence. In: RILES, Annelise (Org.). Rethinking the masters of comparative law. Oxford: Hart, 2001.
MILLER, C. J. Evidence of Conviction in Civil Proceedings - III. New Law Journal, v. 121, p. 622 et seq., 1971.
MOCCIA, Luigi. Historical Overview on the Origins and Attitudes of Comparative Law. In: WITTE, Bruno de; FORDER, Caroline (Orgs.). The common law of Europe and the future of legal education. Deventer: Metro; Kluwer, 1992.
MORÉTEAU, Olivier. Premier pas dans la comparaison des droits. In: GÉMAR, Jean-Claude; KASSIRER, Nicholas (Orgs.). Jurilinguistique: entre langues et droits - Jurilinguistics: between law and language. Bruxelles: Bruylant; Thémis, 2005.
OLIPHANT, Ken. Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services (2002). In: MITCHELL, Charles; MITCHELL, Paul (Orgs.). Landmark cases in the law of tort. Oxford : Hart, 2010.
ONIONS, C. T. Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.
ÖRÜCÜ, Esin. A General View of “Legal Families” and of “Mixing Systems”. In: ÖRÜCÜ, Esin; NELKEN, David (Orgs.). Comparative law: a handbook. Oxford: Hart, 2007.
ÖRÜCÜ, Esin. Developing Comparative Law. In: ÖRÜCÜ, Esin; NELKEN, David (Orgs.). Comparative law: a handbook. Oxford: Hart, 2007.
ÖRÜCÜ, Esin; NELKEN, David (Orgs.). Comparative law: a handbook. Oxford: Hart, 2007.
PACHECO, Joaquín Francisco. El Código Penal. Madrid: Edisofer, 2000.
PALMER, Vernon. Mixed Legal Systems... and the Myth of Pure Laws. Louisiana Law Review, v. 67, n. 4, p. 1205–1218, 2007.
PANTALEÓN PRIETO, Ángel Fernando. Comentario al STS 13 julio 1984. Cuadernos Civitas de Jurisprudencia Civil, n. 6, p. 1953 et seq., 1984.
PANTALEÓN PRIETO, Ángel Fernando. “Perseverare diabolicum”: ¿Otra vez la responsabilidad civil en el Código Penal? Jueces para la democracia, n. 19, p. 6–10, 1993.
PANTALEÓN PRIETO, F. Prescripción. In: MELGAR, Alfredo Montoya (Org.). Enciclopedia Jurídica Básica. Madrid: Civitas, 1995, v. III.
PETERS, Anne; SCHWENKE, Heiner. Comparative Law Beyond Post-Modernism. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, v. 49, n. 4, p. 800–834, 2000.
POLLOCK, Frederick. The History of Comparative Jurisprudence. Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation, v. 5, n. 1, p. 74–89, 1903.
POUND, Roscoe. Some thoughts about comparative law. In: DÖLLE, Hans; COUDRES, Hans Peter (Orgs.). Festschrift für Ernst Rabel. Tübingen: Mohr, 1954, v. 1.
RABEL, Ernst. Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung. München: Max Hueber, 1925.
RABEL, Ernst. Das Rechts des Warenkaufs. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1938.
RAZ, Joseph. The Concept of a Legal System. 2. ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 1980.
REGLERO CAMPOS, Luis Fernando Reglero. La prescripción de la acción de reclamación de daños. In: REGLERO CAMPOS, Luis Fernando (Org.). Tratado de responsabilidad civil. Madrid: Arazandi, 2002.
REIMANN, Mathias. Rechtsvergleichung und Rechtsgeschichte im Dialog. Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht, v. 7, n. 3, p. 496 et seq., 1999.
REIMANN, Mathias; ZIMMERMANN, Reinhard (Orgs.). Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
REITZ, John C. How to Do Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 46, n. 4, p. 617–636, 1998.
RHEINSTEIN, Max. Teaching Comparative Law. University of Chicago Law Review, v. 5, n. 4, p. 615–624, 1938.
RILES, Annelise (Org.). Rethinking the masters of comparative law. Oxford: Hart, 2001.
RIPOLLÉS Y BARANDA, Mariano. Discurso Leido en la Solemne Inauguracion del curso Académico de 1888 á 1889 en la Universidad Literaria de Zaragoza: El Derecho Regional y la Codificacion Civil. Zaragoza: C. Ariño, 1888.
ROCA I TRÍAS, Encarna. La codificación y el derecho foral. Revista de derecho privado, v. 62, n. 7, p. 596–642, 1978.
RODRÍGUEZ DEVESA, José María. Responsabilidad civil derivada del delito o falta y culpa extracontractual. In: ALCALÁ-ZAMORA Y CASTILLO, Niceto et al. (orgs.). Libro homenaje a Jaime Guasp. Granada: Comares, 1984. p. 511-527.
ROSEN, Lawrence. Beyond Compare. In: LEGRAND, Pierre; MUNDAY, Roderick J. C. (Orgs.). Comparative legal studies: traditions and transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003.
SACCO, Rodolfo. Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1–34, 1991.
SACCO, Rodolfo. Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (Installment II of II). The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 39, n. 2, p. 343–401, 1991.
SAMUEL, Geoffrey. Can legal reasoning be demystified? Legal Studies, v. 29, n. 2, p. 181–210, 2009.
SAMUEL, Geoffrey. Epistemology and Comparative Law: Contributions from the Sciences and Social Sciences. In: VAN HOECKE, Mark (Org.). Epistemology and methodology of comparative law. Oxford: Hart, 2004, p. 35–78.
SAMUEL, Geoffrey. Is Law really a Social Science? A View from Comparative Law. The Cambridge Law Journal, v. 67, n. 2, p. 288–321, 2008.
SCHËFER, Burkhard; BANKOWSKI, Zenon. Mistaken Identities: the integrative force of Private Law. In: VAN HOECKE, Mark; OST, François (Orgs.). The Harmonisation of European Private Law. Oxford: Hart, 2000.
SMITS, Jan. On Successful Legal Transplants in a Future Ius Commune Europaeum. In: HARDING, Andrew; ÖRÜCÜ, Esin (Orgs.). Comparative law in the 21st century. London: Kluwer, 2002.
SMITS, Jan M. (Orgs.). Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Cheltenham Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006.
SMITS, Jan M.; HUSA, Jaakko; VALCKE, Catherine; et al (Orgs.). Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. 3. ed. Cheltenham Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023.
STAPLETON, Jane. Benefits of Comparative Tort Reasoning: Lost in Translation. Journal of Tort Law, v. 1, n. 3, p. 1–45, 2007.
STAPLETON, Jane. Benefits of Comparative Tort Reasoning: Lost in Translation. In: ANDENAS, Mads; FAIRGRIEVE, Duncan (Orgs.). Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
TETTENBORN, Andrew. Compensating the Cash Strapped: The Sinking of the Liesbosch. Lloyds Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2004.
TEUBNER, Gunther. Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends up in New Divergences. The Modern Law Review, v. 61, n. 1, p. 11–32, 1998.
VIZMANOS, Tomás Maria de; ÁLVAREZ MARTÍNEZ, Cirilo. Comentarios al Nuevo Código Penal. Madrid: J. Gonzales y A. Vicente, 1848.
WATSON, Alan. Aspects of Reception of Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 44, n. 2, p. 335–351, 1996.
WATSON, Alan. Legal transplants: an approach to comparative law. 1. ed. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1974.
WATSON, Alan. Legal transplants: an approach to comparative law. 2. ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1993.
WATSON, Alan. Society and Legal Change. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1977.
WEIR, Tony. The Staggering March of Negligence. In: CANE, P.; STAPLETON, J. (Orgs.). The Law of Obligations: Essays in Honour of John Fleming. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
WILLIAMS, Glanville. The Definition of Crime. Current Legal Problems, v. 8, n. 1, p. 107–130, 1955.
WINTGENS, Luc J. Legisprudence and Comparative Law. In: VAN HOECKE, Mark (Org.). Epistemology and methodology of comparative law. Oxford: Hart, 2004.
YZQUIERDO TOLSADA, Mariano. Aspectos civiles del nuevo codigo penal. Madrid: Dykinson, 1997.
YZQUIERDO TOLSADA, Mariano. El perturbador artículo 1.092 del Código Civil: cien años de errores. In: Centenario del Código Civil. [s.l.]: Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces, 1990, v. 2, p. 2109–2135.
ZEFFERTT, D. The Rule in Hollington v. Hewthhorn Revisited. South African Law Journal, v. 87, p. 325 et seq., 1970.
ZIEGERT, Klaus A. “Within Law the Land Shall be Built” - The Case of Changing Norms Seriously. In: DOEKER-MACH, Guenther; ZIEGERT, Klaus A. (Orgs.). Law and Legal Culture in Comparative Perspective. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2004.
ZIMMERMANN, R. Savigny’s Legacy: Legal History, Comparative Law, and the Emergence of a European Science. Law Quarterly Review, v. 112, p. 576–605, 1996.
ZIMMERMANN, Reinhard. Roman Law, Contemporary Law, European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
ZWEIGERT, Konrad; KÖTZ, Hein. An Introduction to Comparative Law. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
